57th
out of 180 countries, the lowest press freedom ranking in U.S. history

The Press Issue

A data-driven investigation into the erosion of press freedom in the United States, 1735–2026

Data and analysis by David Burton

↓ Scroll to explore
Chapter 1

The Network

Media ownership, political donations, revolving-door employment, influencer pipelines, and government pressure campaigns form an interconnected network. 211 nodes. 331 edges. Explore the web of power.

Color = Political Lean
Left Ctr-L Ctr Ctr-R Right Far-R ?
Size = Connections
Few Many
×
Chapter 2

The Decline

In 2002, when Reporters Without Borders first published its Press Freedom Index, the United States ranked 17th in the world. By 2025, it had fallen to 57th, classified as a "problematic situation."

U.S. Press Freedom Ranking, 2002–2025
RSF World Press Freedom Index · Lower rank = worse · Source: RSF
Diverging from Peer Democracies
RSF rankings: U.S. vs. Germany, UK, Canada, Australia, France · Source: RSF
The Race to the Bottom
Ride the U.S. down through the global rankings, 2002–2025 · View follows the U.S. · Lower rank = better press freedom · Source: RSF World Press Freedom Index
2002
United States
Nordic leaders
Rising democracies
Western democracies
Democratic backsliders
Other countries
Chapter 3

What It Looks Like on the Ground

Since 2017, the U.S. Press Freedom Tracker has documented hundreds of journalists physically assaulted, arrested, or had their equipment seized. The most powerful finding: law enforcement's share of violence against journalists rose from 47% to 94%, a near-monotonic climb across nine years.

The State's Share of Violence Against Journalists
Law enforcement assault ratio, 2017–2025 · The trend is near-monotonically increasing. By 2025, effectively all journalist assaults are state-inflicted · Source: U.S. Press Freedom Tracker
Six Metrics of Press Freedom on the Ground
Each panel on its own y-axis scale · Click any bar to see that year's notable incidents · 2017–2025 · Source: U.S. Press Freedom Tracker
Notable Incidents, 2025–2026
Chapter 4

The Institutional Playbook

Every modern administration has clashed with the press. But the nature has changed. Nixon wiretapped reporters in secret. Trump's second term bans news organizations in broad daylight. The shift from covert to overt, from individual targeting to institutional restructuring, is the story.

Actions Against the Press by Administration
Each square = one documented action · Opacity: solid = overt, faded = covert · Border = institutional scale
The Shift: Covert → Overt
Percentage of actions conducted covertly vs. overtly
293 Years of Press Freedom Conflict
Major incidents from colonial era to present · Circle size = severity · Hover for details
Colonial/Founding
Progressive/WWI
WWII
Cold War
Vietnam/Post-Watergate
Modern (2000–present)
Presidential Press Conferences per Year
Average annual press conferences (solo + joint) · Fewer conferences = less accountability · Source: American Presidency Project (UCSB)
Chapter 5

The Pentagon Press Purge

A. What was already federal law before the policy

Before the September 2025 policy, federal law already addressed classified information and Pentagon security:

B. What the Hegseth policy added beyond existing law

On September 18, 2025, the Department of Defense issued a 17-page media credential policy requiring all Pentagon press corps members to sign a conduct agreement. No previous administration required journalists to sign editorial restrictions as a condition of Pentagon access (RCFP).

The policy requires journalists to:

In practice, prohibiting journalists from gathering unclassified information that has not been officially released limits them to publishing only what the government has approved for release. The function of a free press under the First Amendment is to inform the public about matters of public interest, not to serve as a distribution channel for government-approved messaging.

On October 6, the Pentagon issued a revised version after press organizations objected. The revision removed explicit pre-publication review language but retained the "solicitation" redefinition (RCFP analysis).

On October 15, 30+ news organizations walked out. Only OAN signed from the original Pentagon press corps.

C. What the court ruled

On March 20, 2026, federal judge Paul Friedman ruled the policy unconstitutional, citing First and Fifth Amendment violations and viewpoint discrimination. The court found "undisputed evidence" the policy was designed to replace disfavored journalists with those "willing to serve" the government (CBS News). The ruling ordered reinstatement of revoked credentials and applied to all affected journalists, not only the New York Times (NPR). The Pentagon is appealing.

Before and After: Pentagon Press Corps Composition
~57 credentialed outlets before October 2025, replaced by ~32 signers (1 previously credentialed, 26 new, 5 invited) · Sources: NPR, TIME, RCFP
Five months earlier: White House influencer briefings (April 28 to 30, 2025)
20 attendees across 3 days · 19 of 20 had documented prior Trump support · Clustered by organizational orbit · Source: NBC News
Chapter 6

Who Owns the News

The press freedom crisis unfolds against radical industry consolidation, collapsing newsrooms, and a partisan trust chasm that makes the press structurally vulnerable to political attack.

In 1983
50
companies controlled 90% of U.S. media. Today:
6
Source: Free Press
The Concentration Timeline
Companies controlling 90% of U.S. media + unique newspaper owners over time · Source: Free Press, Northwestern Local News Initiative
Who Owns the Most Newspapers
Top 5 newspaper companies by number of papers owned, 2025 · Source: Northwestern Local News Initiative
The Newsroom Collapse
Newspaper industry employment · Source: BLS, Pew Research
Americans Who Trust the Media
% who trust mass media "a great deal" or "fair amount" · Source: Gallup
The Partisan Trust Gap
% trusting media by party · 43-point gap in 2025 · Source: Gallup
Democrats
Independents
Republicans
Chapter 7

The Legal Thread

Press access to the White House hangs on a single 1977 ruling: Sherrill v. Knight. Every subsequent case traces back to those three procedural protections. If the en banc court weakens them, the legal foundation crumbles. SCOTUS has never reviewed this question.